Skip to main content
CurTask
Sign inStart free

Compare

CurTask vs the tools you use now

Most literature reviews are stitched together from four or five tools. See how CurTask fits with, or replaces, each one.

Reference managers

  • CurTask vs Zotero

    Zotero keeps your references tidy. CurTask adds an AI literature matrix with page and quote, qualitative coding and writing in one project.

  • CurTask vs Mendeley

    Mendeley manages references and PDFs. CurTask adds a literature matrix with page and quote, qualitative coding, a synthesis map and writing in one place.

  • CurTask vs EndNote

    EndNote is a long-standing reference manager. CurTask adds an evidence-backed literature matrix, qualitative coding and modular writing in one project.

Qualitative analysis software

  • CurTask vs NVivo

    Code your papers where you read them, fill a literature matrix with page-and-quote evidence and write with citations, all in one project. CurTask vs NVivo.

  • CurTask vs ATLAS.ti

    An ATLAS.ti alternative for the literature review: code papers, fill a matrix with page-and-quote evidence and write with citations in one project.

  • CurTask vs MAXQDA

    A MAXQDA alternative for literature reviews: code papers, fill a matrix with page-and-quote evidence and write the cited chapter in one browser project.

AI research assistants

  • CurTask vs Elicit

    Compare CurTask and Elicit: AI extraction with a verified page and quote from your own PDFs, plus coding, synthesis and thesis writing in one project.

  • CurTask vs Consensus

    Compare CurTask and Consensus: work from your own PDFs with a verified page and quote for every AI value, then code, synthesise and write in one project.

  • CurTask vs SciSpace

    Compare CurTask and SciSpace: verified page-and-quote evidence from your own PDFs, qualitative coding, a synthesis map and writing linked to its sources.

  • CurTask vs Scite

    Compare CurTask and Scite: mark where your own papers agree or contradict, with a verified page and quote for every AI value, and write in one project.

Writing tools

  • CurTask vs Scrivener

    Scrivener is loved for long-form writing. CurTask adds built-in citations, a link from each citation to its PDF page, and your analysis beside the draft.

  • CurTask vs Notion

    Using Notion for literature notes? CurTask reads your PDFs, fills a matrix with page-and-quote evidence and writes with academic citations in one project.

Literature discovery

  • CurTask vs ResearchRabbit

    ResearchRabbit helps you find papers. CurTask is where you read, analyse and write with them: matrix with page and quote, coding, citations, one project.

  • CurTask vs Connected Papers

    Connected Papers shows how papers relate. CurTask is where you read, compare and write about them, with every AI value tied to a page and a quote.

Systematic review tools

  • CurTask vs Rayyan

    Rayyan is known for screening in systematic reviews. CurTask is where included papers are analysed with page-and-quote evidence, coded and written up.

  • CurTask vs Covidence

    Covidence is known for running systematic reviews. CurTask adds the reading, coding, themes and writing, with every AI value tied to a page and a quote.

Try CurTask on your own papers

Import a few PDFs, fill a literature matrix and see the page and quote behind every value.

Start freeSee how it works

Free plan with monthly AI credits. No card needed.